Tuesday, June 11, 2013

What is a Hypothesis, Theory and Doctrine?



What is a Hypothesis, Theory and Doctrine?
"A defining of Concepts"

Let us consider the usage of the word "theory." We can agree that the scientific process puts a very specific definition on theory. A theory is a hypothesis that has been observed and can repeatedly produce with consistent results through independent scientists.

A hypothesis is an idea of how something might work; it is feasible and can become a theory only after several independent scientists try and fail to disprove the hypothesis in laboratory conditions. Still later research on any factors can change or negate a hypothesis and thus render the theory false.

Micro-evolution (or adaptation) can be observed all the time: breeding livestock, experimenting with fruit flies, and even breeding wolf-dogs. This are animal of the same kind mixing with each other. However on the point of macro-evolution's, abiogenesis' (life from non-life), or cosmic evolution cannot be called theories because they have not been tested nor verified in any way.Considering these types of evolution even further, can they really be called hypothesis? A hypothesis must be feasible.

"For example, I could make a hypothesis that holding a pen above the ground and releasing it would cause it to fall straight down until it hit some other object. I could then test it (and so could you). A clever person could even use a magnetic pen and prove the hypothesis false, which would likely result in restating or more clearly defining the hypothesis. I could try to prove that hypothesis false."

After much research into the field I have not seen any explanation as to how the ideas of abiogenesis'
 or macro-evolution can be tested to see if they are false. Likewise, it has been my observation that you cannot prove or disprove God (Heb 11:1), so that would not be a scientific hypothesis.

So, what would we call these ideas? They are not tested theories and they are not falsifiable hypothesis. I would call them doctrine, which is defined as any statement describing how you believe things are, should be, or should work. Many people have devised ideas of how macro-evolution could possibly take place and even generate some diagrams, but no test has ever been proposed or conducted to the best of my knowledge.


The following types of Evolution are described:

1. Cosmic Evolution: The origin of time, space and matter, by the Big Bang

2. Chemical Evolution: The origin of higher elements from hydrogen.

3. Stellar and Planetary Evolution: The origin of stars and planets.

4. Organic Evolution: The origin of Life.

5. Macro-Evolution: The changing from one kind of species to another kind of species.

6. Micro-Evolution: The variation within kinds of species.



Observations about the different types of Evolution

- Of the above supposed 6 types of Evolution, only the last one, Micro-Evolution, has ever been observed.

- The other 5 types of Evolution are part of the Theory of Evolution.

- The other 5 types of Evolution are all classified as theoretical, and have never been observed.

- They cannot be reproduced in a laboratory, and do not therefore fall under the strict definition of a science.

- Evolution is currently taught as fact, even though the factual content of the Theory of Evolution cannot be proved or disproved, since nobody was present nor can they be reproduced in a laboratory.


Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Faith Vs Faith


Being a man who searches for the truth, who loves science, logic and fact and also a man of faith I recently decided to re-look at evolution. For fourteen years I have been taught about evolution and I can say micro-evolution is fact. All Kinds (Species if you wish) adapt to their environment over generation. Still the scope of evolution as it is taught is far more encompassing. There are many theories that make no sense and are to many whole that can not be explained. Being a man of Faith I believe that intelligent design fills in these gaps. This blog is dedicated to address issues using science and taking into account that Biblical Narrative of Genesis as historical fact. That being said one might argue that we can not since the Bible is a document of faith.Well the theory of the Big Bang and billions of years are unproven theories that science also believe in faith. Since both are as such we will look at both from  a level prospective.  Faith against Faith we will use science and fact to find the truth.